Snort mailing list archives
-b binary capture]
From: Greg Sarsons <gsarsons () home com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:22:51 -0400
I see that snort by default with binary dump captures 1514. Well this is just to much for my little 30 Gig hard drive on a busy school network. I'm going to do some analysis with snort after but will also be using tcptrace, ipfw and a few others. If I grab 10%, say 150 vice 1514, will I really be limiting what I can do after? Doesn't tcpdump by default grab 68. The traffic bw from what I know on the network has peaked at about 20Mb/sec but the average seems to be 11Mb/sec. If I plug into another smaller subnet the traffic bw could drop even more. Again this has got to fit on a 30Gig drive. The more days that I can capture the better for the statistics. Filling the hard drive in only one day doesn't really give a nice look. Any recommendations? Greg _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- -b binary capture] Greg Sarsons (Sep 28)
- WhiteHats? David Hekimian (Sep 28)
- RE: WhiteHats? Frank Reid (Sep 30)
- Re: WhiteHats? Bob Bernstein (Sep 30)
- Re: WhiteHats? Martin Roesch (Sep 30)
- RE: WhiteHats? Frank Reid (Sep 30)
- WhiteHats? David Hekimian (Sep 28)