Snort mailing list archives

alert without logging


From: "Nathan W. Labadie" <ab0781 () wayne edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:01:00 -0400

Is there any way to write a rule so that it _doesn't_ log an alert?

I'm currently running snort against two B subnets. The amount of 
CodeRed and Nimda probes that hit the network is fairly high (ie, 5000+ 
per hour). The number of machines on the network that become infected 
is also extremely high. Anyone that's worked in an academic environment 
will understand my pain ;).

Anyways, I'd like to make use of flexible response _without_ having to 
parse though 100,000 alerts at the end of the day. ie, snorts sees a 
request for cmd.exe, kills the connection, and goes on its merry way 
without generating an alert. Is this possible?

Thanks,
Nate

-- 
Nathan W. Labadie       | ab0781 () wayne edu   
Sr. Security Specialist | 313/577.2126
Wayne State University  | 313/577.5626 fax
C&IT Security Office: http://security.wayne.edu


_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: