Snort mailing list archives
Queuing MSSQL log data without Barnyard
From: "Burleson, Lee (IA)" <Lee.Burleson () ia ngb army mil>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:54:24 -0500
Just an idea for anyone that is interested; feedback appreciated. In the absence of Barnyard, I am toying with the following scenario: * Central DB: Win2k, MSSQL Standard, with Replication components installed * Snort sensor(s): Win2k, MSSQL _Personal_, Snort configured to log to itself * The sensors would then be set up to replicate their local Snort DB the Central DB, in a push only scenario. * All traffic between sensors and Central DB would be secured with IPSec. * MSSQL Replication would be handled in a queuing fashion. * No more problems with downtime of Central DB, as Sensors are logging to themselves. - Lee _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Queuing MSSQL log data without Barnyard Burleson, Lee (IA) (Sep 24)
- Re: Queuing MSSQL log data without Barnyard Chris Green (Sep 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Queuing MSSQL log data without Barnyard Burleson, Lee (IA) (Sep 24)
- Re: Queuing MSSQL log data without Barnyard Chris Green (Sep 24)