Snort mailing list archives
Should I assume it has been safe?
From: Subba Rao <subba9 () home com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 18:02:13 +0000
I have been logging the tcpdump logs for a couple of months now. Now that I am running snort (once again) under daemontools, the snort logs are pretty quite. So I ran snort against the tcpdump logs. The snort configuration was the default configuration + MaxVision's ruleset. Snort completed processing the files normally with no screen output (except the summary statistics). Should I assume that everything is fine or should I allow my paranoia feed itself and look for something else in the logs? When should I say I have dissected the log files inside out? Should that be after the rule set combination that I am using? Thanks for any input. -- Subba Rao subba9 () home com http://members.home.net/subba9/ GPG public key ID 27FC9217 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Should I assume it has been safe? Subba Rao (May 15)