Secure Coding mailing list archives
Question about SSE-CMM
From: lists at ticm.com (Bret Watson)
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:36:15 +0800
Hi Fransisco, definitely - the principles are the same. I used this a couple of years ago to bring a group from 0 to lvl 1... Of course what really tends to happen is that some parts actually move to 3+ whilst others only just make it to 1 level - and by the rules of CMM you can only claim the level that all processes have achieved. This may be your confusion as SSE-CMM spends more time talking about this that CMMI Cheers, Bret At 07:00 PM 8/10/2007, Francisco Nunes wrote:
Dear list members. After reading SSE-CMM, I became confused whether SSE-CMM can be used to improve their PAs like CMMI does, i.e., both improve in continuous or in staged way. Please, what are your opinions? Thank you. Yours sincerely, Francisco. Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o ?nico sem limite de espa?o para armazenamento! http://br.mail.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L at securecoding.org List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com) as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community. _______________________________________________
Current thread:
- Question about SSE-CMM Francisco Nunes (Oct 08)
- Question about SSE-CMM Bret Watson (Oct 08)