Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists
From: Brett Hutley <brett () hutley net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:48:19 +0000
Jared W. Robinson wrote: Could a branding campaign be used to promote secure software? Various people have stated that the reason software isn't more secure is that consumers don't demand it. Some kind of a consumer-targeted branding campaign might help. The idea would be to put a sticker or a logo on software that met some level of security expectation. Customers could be educated to look for these stickers, and it would hopefully influence their purchasing decisions. *snip* I think it's a good idea. Remember 10+ years ago when software shipped with a tick mark on it and the label "Purified", to indicate that the developers had run Purify over the code to identify memory leaks? -- Brett Hutley [MAppFin,CISSP,SANS GCIH] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hutley.net/brett
Current thread:
- Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Jared W. Robinson (Jan 07)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Brett Hutley (Jan 08)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Crispin Cowan (Jan 08)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Jared W. Robinson (Jan 08)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Crispin Cowan (Jan 09)
- RE: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists David Crocker (Jan 10)
- RE: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists ljknews (Jan 10)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Jeff Williams @ Aspect (Jan 11)
- Re: Security Standard Branding & Expectation Checklists Jared W. Robinson (Jan 08)