FC: Spam Arrest does appear to be resorting to... spamming

[Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>]

Previous Politech message:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-04454.html

---

From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <suresh () hserus net>
To: <declan () well com>
Subject: Re: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:04:10 +0530

On Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:06 PM [GMT+0530=IST],
Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> wrote:

> [Neil has been a reliable contributor to Politech for a while on the
> topic of spam. But naturally I will give Spam Arrest the right of
> reply, and forward unedited any response they choose to provide.
> --Declan]

More than one person has reported receiving this - spamarrest has
apparently sent this letter to _anybody_ who sent mail to a spamarrest
customer.

This repurposing of addresses is blatant optout spam ... none of the
people who sent mail to a spamarrest subscriber should be expected to
receive solicitations from spamarrest.

For what its worth, I was blocking spamarrest's IP as an open relay
(running an antiquated version of CommuniGate Pro) which had relayed
spam to our users, since the past several weeks.

So, none of my users will have got this solicitation from them.

    srs

---

rom: Amos Satterlee <asatterlee () inta org>
To: "'declan () well com'" <declan () well com>
Subject: RE: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:00:40 -0500

Yeah, I got one, too. Addressed to our Sys Admin account, which is only a
receive account.

Funny thing is that they didn't send one to my person account. Definitely
dictionary spam.

Amos

---

From: David Bolduc <dbolduc () aus scmplaw com>
To: "'declan () well com'" <declan () well com>
Subject: RE: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:22:34 -0600

Me too.  I have *no* recollection of having sent an email to a SpamArrest
customer, or of visiting the SpamArrest site.

---

From: "Brian Durham" <briandurham () mindspring com>
To: <declan () well com>
Subject: Re: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming?
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:15:11 -0600

Declan:

I received that email from Spam Arrest Wednesday - same circumstances.

Best,
Brian Durham

---

Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:24:17 -0600
From: Kenneth Loafman <loafman () spamcop net>
To: declan () well com
Cc: politech () politechbot com, support () spamarrest com, pr () spamarrest com
Subject: Re: FC: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming?

As a matter of fact they are spamming.  I got one in the mail this 
morning.  I do remember responding to a SpamArrest customer, but that does 
not give SpamArrest itself permission to contact me.

Promptly reported to SpamCop.

...Ken

---




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------