FC: Is the RIAA spamming peer-to-peer users? Is it blackhole time?

[Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>]

---

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:19:18 -0400
From: "Paul Levy" <PLEVY () citizen org>
To: <declan () well com>
Subject: Is it spam?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Do these IM's meet the definition of spam offered the anti-spam crowd?
Bulk, unsolicited and indeed affirmatively unwanted electronic messages,
right?

Should they be forbidden?  Should the companies that send them and the
ISP's who forward them be blackholed?

Paul Alan Levy
Public Citizen Litigation Group
1600 - 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 588-1000
http://www.citizen.org/litigation/litigation.html

>>> Dave Farber <dave () farber net> 04/30/03 06:46AM >>>

------ Forwarded Message
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne () warpspeed com>



April 30, 2003
Music Swappers Get a Message on PC Screens: Stop It Now
By AMY HARMON
<http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/30/business/30MUSI.html>

The record industry started another campaign yesterday aimed at
making life more uncomfortable for online music-swapping fans.

Thousands of people trading copyrighted music online yesterday saw a
message appear unbidden on their computer screens: "When you break
the law, you risk legal penalties. There is a simple way to avoid
that risk: DON'T STEAL MUSIC."

The messages, which seek to turn a chat feature in popular
file-trading software to the industry's benefit, reflect the latest
effort among record executives to limit digital copying of their
products.

"People feel invincible when they're doing this in the privacy of
their homes," said Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry
Association of America. "This is a way of letting them know that what
they're doing is illegal."

The association plans to send at least a million warnings a week to
people offering popular songs for others to copy. Operated by a
company that industry officials declined to identify, the automated
system uses a feature in both KaZaA and Grokster, free software
commonly used to share music files, that was designed to let users
communicate with one another.

A spokeswoman for Sharman Networks, the distributor of KaZaA, said
that the tactic violated the company's user agreement, which
prohibits making search requests to accumulate information about
individual users. Sharman, which is based in Vanuatu, a Pacific
island nation, said in a statement, "We strenuously object to efforts
outside the law, in violation of user agreements, or in violation of
the privacy rights to indiscriminately spam, mislead or confuse" its
users.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------