Politech mailing list archives

FC: Justice Department offes details of Microsoft antitrust deal


From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:39:51 -0500

Today the Justice Department filed its Competitive Impact Statement, which gives additional details of the Microsoft settlement deal and offers a glimpse at the alternatives that goverment attorneys considered during their negotiations.

I've placed it online here:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/ms.statement.111501.html
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/ms.statement.111501.pdf

An excerpt from what-might-have-been:
The United States considered a number of alternatives to the Proposed Final Judgment. The United States is satisfied, however, that the requirements and prohibitions contained in the Proposed Final Judgment, supported by strong compliance and enforcement procedures, provide a prompt, certain and effective remedy for the violations Microsoft has committed. First, the United States considered litigation of the issue of remedy in the District Court. The United States balanced the strength of the provisions obtained in the Proposed Final Judgment; the need for prompt relief in a case in which illegal conduct has long gone unremedied; the strength of the parties' respective positions in a remedies hearing and the uncertainties inherent in litigation; and the time and expense required for litigation of the remedy.

Information about how DOJ and the signing states will oversee Microsoft for the next five years or so:
The United States and individual Plaintiff States each have authority to enforce the Proposed Final Judgment. Plaintiff States will coordinate their enforcement efforts through an enforcement committee, and in consultation with the United States. Enforcement by the United States or plaintiff States may include any legal actions or proceedings that may be appropriate to a particular situation, including petitions in criminal or civil contempt, petitions for injunctive relief to halt or prevent violations, motions for declaratory judgment to clarify or interpret particular provisions, and motions to modify the Final Judgment. While Microsoft will be given a reasonable opportunity to cure violations of Sections III.C., III.D., III.E. and III.H. of the Proposed Final Judgment prior to the filing of enforcement petitions, ex post abatement of violations will not be a defense to enforcement, through contempt actions or otherwise, of any knowing, willful or systematic violations by Microsoft or other persons specified in Section II of the Proposed Final Judgment.

Justification for the settlement:
The relief contained in the Proposed Final Judgment provides prompt, certain and effective remedies for consumers. The requirements and prohibitions will eliminate Microsoft's illegal practices, prevent recurrence of the same or similar practices, and restore the competitive threat that middleware products posed prior to Microsoft's unlawful undertakings.

Text of revised Microsoft antitrust settlement:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02762.html

Photos from the courthouse after the settlement hearing:
http://www.mccullagh.org/theme/microsoft-states-settle-nov01.html

-Declan




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: