Politech mailing list archives
FC: Child "privacy" law claims another victim: Altavista yanks sites
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:47:19 -0500
AltaVista said today that it "has closed down all of its community services, which includes all interactive services, such as chat rooms, bulletin boards and free email. AltaVista is committed to screening children under the age of 13 from accessing adult content on the AltaVista Web site." The BBB's CARU says "it found violations of the Guidelines and/or COPPA." COPPA is the federal law that applies here, and the guidelines were inspired by federal action. COPPA has forced other companies to shut down free services too (funny how its backers never mentioned its negative impacts when testifying before an all-too-credulous, not to mention economically ignorant and technically clueless Congress): http://www.politechbot.com/cgi-bin/politech.cgi?name=coppa News coverage: http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4820233.html?tag=mn_hd One interesting bit from the BBB statement:
While some "adults only" clubs required registration, others did not, and there was no need to register, or even give one's age, in order to view the pictures. Despite statements that one must be over age 18 to enter, in fact, a child of any age, by merely clicking "OK," could certify that she was over age 18 and gain access to the rooms. No request for date of birth or any other personal information was required. Even users registered as age 13 were admitted to these "Clubs."
(Let's ignore that fact that a so-called "privacy" law is encouraging sites to collect "personal information" about their visitors.) Well, gosh darnit. Wasn't that what the ACLU litigated -- and won -- in the CO-oneP-A lawsuit? An entire section of the district court's opinion was devoted to "Reorganizing a Web Site to Segregate Harmful to Minors Materials." See: http://www.aclu.org/court/acluvrenoII_pi_order.html Civil libertarians quite properly objected to that register-or-segregate approach, saying that the government should not place additional burdens on First Amendment-protected speech. See: http://www.politechbot.com/cgi-bin/politech.cgi?name=copa What the censorhappy anti-porn folks failed to accomplish by a law punishing sexually explicit material, they're managing to accomplish through "privacy" laws instead. We'll ban Net-sex not by claiming a child's innocence is being violated, but that his privacy is. Ain't that just swell? -Declan *********** DECISION TO FOLLOW CARU NEWS Contact: Elizabeth Lascoutx 212.705.0123 or Phyllis Spaeth 212-705-0117 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ALTA VISTA MAKES CHANGES TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF CHILDREN ON ITS WEBSITE. COMPANY DISCONTINUES ITS "COMMUNITY" FEATURES New York, NY - February 14, 2001 - The Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (CBBB) is pleased to announce that Alta Vista Company (Alta Vista) has modified its Website in order to protect the safety of children. Until a week ago, Alta Vista was a full service Internet portal that, in addition to its search engine, offered such interactive features as chat rooms, photo albums, personal home pages and free Internet service including free email. When CARU examined altavista.com in the fall of 2000, the language of the registration page "tipped off" children that they must be over age 13 to use the interactive services offered on the site by stating "U.S. law prohibits Alta Vista from registering anyone under the age of 13 without parental permission. Please verify your age below," and then asking prospective registrants if they were "less than 13 years old" or "13 or older..." Those who registered could freely access all interactive features on the site, including unmoderated chat rooms in which participants could post personal information and talk to users of all ages, and personal home pages, on which registrants could post personal information that would be accessible to other users of the Internet. In addition, Alta Vista failed to prevent children and teens from registering for chat rooms listed under "romance and relationships," which were "adults only" clubs, or to block those under 13 from accessing pornographic pictures on its chat sites. While some "adults only" clubs required registration, others did not, and there was no need to register, or even give one's age, in order to view the pictures. Despite statements that one must be over age 18 to enter, in fact, a child of any age, by merely clicking "OK," could certify that she was over age 18 and gain access to the rooms. No request for date of birth or any other personal information was required. Even users registered as age 13 were admitted to these "Clubs." Alta Vista has recently closed down all its "Community" services (i.e., all its interactive services, such as chat rooms, bulletin boards and free email) and now operates solely as a search engine. The company stated, "AltaVista is committed to screening children under the age of 13 from accessing adult content on the AltaVista Web site." There is no longer any registration or collection of personal information on the site. CARU's inquiry was conducted under NAD/NARB/CARU Procedures for Voluntary Self-Regulation of National Advertising. Details of the inquiry, CARU's decision and the advertiser's response will be included in the next NAD Case Report. Members of the press who wish to see a copy of the decision now should email CARU at elascoutx () caru bbb org or pspaeth () caru bbb org. ### The National Advertising Review Council (NARC) was formed in 1971 by the Association of National Advertisers, Inc. (ANA), the American Association of Advertising Agencies, Inc. (AAAA), the American Advertising Federation, Inc. (AAF), and the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (CBBB). Its purpose is to foster truth and accuracy in national advertising through voluntary self-regulation. NARC is the body that establishes the policies and procedures for the CBBB's National Advertising Division (NAD), the Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU), and the National Advertising Review Board (NARB). NAD and CARU are the investigative arms of the advertising industry's voluntary self-regulation program. Their casework results from competitive challenges from other advertisers, and also from self-monitoring traditional and new media, including the Internet. The National Advertising Review Board (NARB), the appeals body, is a peer group from which ad-hoc panels are selected to adjudicate those cases that are not resolved at the NAD/CARU level. This unique, self-regulatory system is funded entirely by the business community; CARU is financed by the children's advertising industry, while NAD/NARB's sole source of funding is derived from membership fees paid to the Council of Better Business Bureaus. ********** ALTA VISTA COMPANY Alta Vista Website Altavista.com * General interest Websites that have knowledge that children under age 13 are on their site should not encourage those children to misstate their ages in order to register for areas that are intended for those over 13. * General interest Websites that offer areas with "adult only" content (for those age 18 and over), should age-screen for users under that age and prevent children under that age from accessing those areas. Basis of Inquiry: In the fall of 2000, altavista.com came to the attention of the Children's Advertising Review Unit (CARU) through its routine monitoring of the Internet. At that time, altavista.com was a full service Internet portal that, in addition to its search engine, offered such interactive features as chat rooms, photo albums, personal home pages and free Internet service including free email. CARU monitors Websites for compliance with CARU's Self-Regulaory Guidelines for Children's Advertising (the Guidelines) as well to the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). The Guidelines and COPPA mandate prior parental permission before site operators can collect personally identifiable information (PII) (e.g., first and last name, email address, street address, etc.). Because the operator acknowledges in its Privacy Policy that children under age 13 could use its site, the site falls under the jurisdiction of CARU. CARU's Findings: When CARU first examined altavista.com, (AV) it found violations of the Guidelines and/or COPPA involving the following: 1. Use of registration language that encourages children under age 13 to misstate their ages. 2. Failure to adequately prevent children from accessing altavista.com clubs (chat rooms) with "adult only" content. Use of Language that Encourages Misstatement of Age/Failure to Use Tracking Mechanism: Despite the following language in Alta Vista's privacy policy, "Our site complies with the terms of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. We will not knowingly collect personally identifiable information on users under the age of 13 without parental consent. Parents have the ability to control what personal information about their child may be disclosed to third parties..." children under age 13 could easily register for AV and use its interactive services, such as chat rooms and free email, without parental consent. This was true for two reasons: First, children underage 13 were "tipped off" regarding the age of admission for these services and therefore could easily register for altavista.com and use its interactive services by claiming to be 13 or over. AV's registration page, directly before asking for date of birth, contained the following statement: "U.S. law prohibits Alta Vista from registering anyone under the age of 13 without parental permission. Please verify your age below." Prospective registrants were then asked to click on one of the following: * "I am less than 13 years old" * "I am 13 or older and my birthdate is Month______ Day_____ Year_______" This type of language is prohibited by the Guidelines, which state, inter alia, "Care should be taken so that screening questions do not encourage children to provide inaccurate information to avoid obtaining parental permission." (Page 9 of the Guidelines). Further, CARU determined that AV's registration process is also ineffective because it does not utilize a tracking mechanism (such as a "session cookie") to prohibit underage users from changing their ages and immediately reregistering. For example, if a child clicked on the second option, but gave a date of birth that corresponded to an age younger than 13, a message would appear as follows: "We're sorry, but in order to comply with recent U.S. legislation called COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act), which is intended to protect the privacy of kids less than 13 years of age, we cannot register anyone under 13 years old at this time." Directly below this message, however, the potential registrant is presented with her previously filled in personal information, including date of birth. One can now change one's year of birth to reflect an age 13 or over, and thereby gain entrance to any of the interactive features offered by the operator. When a CARU staff member, who had attempted to register as a 12 year old, was given this message, she merely changed the last digit on her year of birth, from a 9 (in 1989) to a 6, and left everything else as it was presented to her, and was easily able to be accepted as a registrant, with full access to all interactive features. CARU finds that the operator thus had actual knowledge that there was a child under 13, and therefore is in violation of the requirements of both the Guidelines and COPPA. Inadequate Age-Screening for "Adults Only" Chat Rooms: AV contains several chat rooms, sometimes referred to as "clubs" on its Website, which are designated "Adults Only." If one clicks on one of the sites, for example, "! 4-Dates Chat and Matchmaking!" a screen will appear stating: "ADULTS ONLY CLUB ! 4-Dates Chat and Matchmaking! Welcome. The Club you are about to enter has been identified as containing adult content. Discussions and other postings might not be appropriate for all users. Before entering this Club or any Club that contains adult content you must read and agree to the following: 1. You are an adult ( 18 years or older) and have read and understand the Adult Content Agreement...." The user is then asked to click on either "OK" or "Cancel." No request for date of birth or any other personal information is required. Even users registered as age 13 are admitted to these "Clubs." Although Alta Vista acknowledges in its Privacy Policy that it has children under age 13 on its site, the operator failed to insure that children under 13 could not register for the chat rooms and failed to screen those under age 18 from registering for its "adults only" clubs. Anyone using the AV Website (even those who have not registered, and therefore, regardless of age) is able to access pornographic pictures on the site. While some "adults only" clubs require registration, others do not, and there is no need to register, or even give one's age, in order to view pornographic pictures. In light of the fact that AV has knowledge that some of its users are 13 (or even younger, as seen by their first attempt at registration), and acknowledges that certain clubs should only be available to those age 18 or over, CARU finds that the failure to screen out users under 18 from these clubs is a violation of CARU's Guidelines and COPPA. Advertiser's Position: When contacted by CARU, the operator readily agreed to change its registration page by removing any reference to the necessity of being age 13 or over to register and substituting the following: "U.S. law requires that we ask your birthdate. Please verify your age: Month______ day_____year______" This change was made by mid-December of 2000. The operator explained that it had used the original registration statement because many adult users were reluctant to give their correct age and were entering a year of birth that would result in an age of less than one year. Further, AV stated that it expected to shut down its "Community" services (i.e., all its interactive services, such as chat rooms, bulletin boards and free email) in the very near future. In addition, when it was brought to the operator's attention that the AV Website made pornography and inappropriate chat accessible to those under age 18, and even those under 13, AV acknowledged the problem, stating that "anonymous users may enter the adult areas of our community services by confirming their age as over 18." The operator asserted, however, that because the company intended to close down all its "Community" services (i.e., all its interactive services, such as chat rooms, bulletin boards and free email) by the end of January or mid-February 2001, it did not need to add the use of a tracking mechanism in the interim. DECISION CARU is pleased that Alta Vista was willing to make expeditious changes in its registration in order to avoid encouraging children to misstate their ages. Although the site still offered pornographic chat rooms on January 23, 2001, when CARU sent the operator its decision (including an admonition to employ a method to prevent children under age 18 from accessing pornography), CARU confirmed that, on February 6, when CARU received the advertiser's statement, AV had closed down all of its community services and offered no interactive features on its Website. CARU is gratified that AV has taken all the above-stated actions. Advertiser's Statement: "Alta Vista has closed down all of its community services, which includes all interactive services, such as chat rooms, bulletin boards and free email. AltaVista is committed to screening children under the age of 13 from accessing adult content on the AltaVista Web site." * 2001. Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (#0000 pbs closed 2/7/01) *********** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Child "privacy" law claims another victim: Altavista yanks sites Declan McCullagh (Feb 14)