Politech mailing list archives

FC: Indian court rules that search engine liable for links to porn


From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 00:53:17 -0500

[We have a writeup here: http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,40432,00.html A quick glance says rediff.com is a fairly standard portal/news site, with original articles, free email, and online shopping. --Declan]

*******

From: "David Burt" <dburt () n2h2 com>
To: "Declan McCullagh" <declan () well com>
Cc: "James S. Tyre" <jstyre () jstyre com>
Subject: Indian Judge: Search Engine Access to Porn Makes Provider Liable
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:21:55 -0800


Copyright 2000 FT Asia Intelligence Wire
All rights reserved.
Copyright 2000 Business Line.
BUSINESS LINE

November 30, 2000

LENGTH: 501 words

HEADLINE: India: 'Rediff purveying pornography'

BODY:


PUNE, Nov. 29. IN a landmark order, a Pune judge has held Rediff.com responsible for spreading pornographic material on the Internet.

In an order dated November 27, the First Class Judicial Magistrate, Mr S. Bhosle, held that there was enough evidence to place the Directors of Rediff Communications Ltd on trial for offences under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (distribution of pornographic material) and Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code (abetment).

According to the order, if convicted, the Directors of Rediff Communications Ltd - Mr Ajit Balakrishnan (Chairman, accused No. 1), Mr Arun Nanda, Mr Abhay Havaldar, Mr Sunil Phatarphekar, Mr Charles Robert Kaye and Mr Tony Janz (accused No. 2 to 7) - could face imprisonment for up to two years.

In his five-page order, the magistrate held that the search facility offered by Rediff.com could be used to view Web sites containing pornographic material. The Directors have been summoned to the Criminal court in Pune on December 30.

The order has been issued on a complaint filed on June 21 by a Pune-based law student. Mr Rohas Nagpal, President of the Asian School of Cyber Laws from Pune, represented the complainant.

The student, who accessed the Net from a local Internet cafe, found that pornographic and obscene materials were easily available and could be viewed by using the search facilities of Rediff.com.

The complaint had also alleged that the company was providing the facility of the search engine.

Mr Nagpal said that he had verified the complaint, adding that an investigation by the police had become necessary.

He pointed out that the investigating officer had supported the facts stated by the complainant but differed in the opinion only on the point that these sites were based in the US and that currently, there was no machinery available which could separate the obscene sites from other information sites.

The officer had said that "viewing" of such sites totally depended on the viewers and submitted his report that the accused were not responsible for the offence.

But Mr Nagpal said that two Web sites, 123india.com and Compuserve.com, had successfully filtered all obscene materials from their sites and access through their search engines for such materials was not possible.

He noted that the technology for filtering the obscene material was available and that Rediff.com should also utilise it.
[snip --DBM]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| David Burt, Market Research Manager dburt () n2h2 com http://www.n2h2.com/ |
| Intelligent Technologies For A Safe and Productive Internet |
|| Phone 206 892-1130  Fax: 509 271-4226 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact.
To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: