Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Fwd: [Dataloss] Merrick Bank v. Savvis: Analysis of the Merrick Bank Complaint
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:24:55 -0400
From the folks at Attrition and the DataLossDB.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: security curmudgeon <jericho () attrition org> Date: Jun 3, 2009 7:54 PM Subject: [Dataloss] Merrick Bank v. Savvis: Analysis of the Merrick Bank Complaint To: dataloss-discuss () datalossdb org, dataloss () datalossdb org http://infoseccompliance.com/2009/06/03/merrick-bank-v-savvis-analysis-of-the-merrick-bank-complaint/ Merrick Bank v. Savvis: Analysis of the Merrick Bank Complaint Posted on June 3rd, 2009 by David Navetta The Merrick Bank v. Savvis lawsuit has the potential to change the liabilty dynamic of the PCI regulatory system. The Savvis case is one of the first known instances of a payment card security assessor being sued by a merchant bank ( the merchant bank is a third party relative to the Savvis-CardSystems relationship). The Merrick Bank compliant alleges that it relied on Savvis certification of CardSystems as Visa CISP compliant (this matter pre-dated the PCI standard), and that certification was false. After CardSystems suffered a breach exposing up to 40 million payment card records, Merrick allegedly incurred $16 million in payments to the card brands (which was ultimately transferred to issuing banks who suffered losses arising out of the CardSystem breach). If Savvis is held liable (or even if this case makes it past motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment) it has the potential to significantly modify the relative risk of PCI qualified security assessors, and in turn modify the PCI regulatory scheme. This post discusses the two theories of liability alleged by Merrick: (1) negligence; and (2) negligent misrepresentation. [..] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified. http://www.iacertification.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Fwd: [Dataloss] Merrick Bank v. Savvis: Analysis of the Merrick Bank Complaint Jeffrey Walton (Jun 03)