Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison
From: anantasec <anantasec () googlemail com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:06:17 +0200
I'm glad I could help. Yes, this is also my opinion: A tool is only as better as the person using it. The results from these scanners should be reviewed by a knowledgeable human. These tools are designed to help (not replace) a human. It makes me smile when I read on some vendor website: Our tool "Assures PCI Compliance including 6.6". An automated tool would never do that. On 1/28/09, Dotzero <dotzero () gmail com> wrote:
anantasec, I just did a quick read of your report. Thanks for making it available. I think the main take away for me is that it reconfirms that they are just tools and depending on the operator (experience) mileage may vary.
-- http://anantasec.blogspot.com
Current thread:
- Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 27)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison Andre Gironda (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison love.wadhwa () naukri com (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison Dotzero (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison Derek Fountain (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison Adriel T. Desautels (Jan 28)
- Re: Web Application Scanners Comparison anantasec (Jan 28)