Re: web service fuzzers

["Benny Tsai" <benny.tsai () gmail com>]

Thanks for the great info, everyone :)  Unfortunately, it's all become
rather moot.  For business reasons, the project has been suspended
indefinitely.

But thank you for all the awesome info :)

-Benny

On 9/7/07, Atrysk News <news () atrysk com> wrote:
> You might also check out the following (not necessarily fuzzers, but
> absolutely in the ws space...)
>
>         - wspawn
>         - wsknight
>         - wsrook
>         - wsaudit
>
> T
>
> http://www.atrysk.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Jan Münther wrote:
>
>
> > fuzzing capability yet.  Any suggestions?
> Mmhm, seen WSBang?
> http://www.isecpartners.com/wsbang.html
>
> Python's WSDL parsing / proxy class generation is somewhat b0rked, which
> is one of the reasons I've started writing a webservice fuzzer in C#
> which instantiates the proxy classes and uses reflection to find out
> which arguments there are and how to fuzz them. It basically works, but
> it's so cruddy and idiosyncratic I don't think it'll ever see anyone
> else's harddisk. Just a suggestion on a concept in case you think of
> rolling your own.
>
> Cheers,
>
> j.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Need to secure your web apps NOW?
> Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
> Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
>
> http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------