Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Which router to choose for port scanning
From: Volker Tanger <vtlists () wyae de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:57:18 +0100
Greetings! On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:40:34 +0100 Tobias Glemser <tglemser () tele-consulting com> wrote:
Has anyone experiences with DSL-Routers != Cisco and doing port scans? != Cisco means pricing should be under ~300 EUR each.
How about using old (P2, with PCI bus network card) or small PCs (like eBox, about 100 EUR new) as Linux or *BSD boxen directly as DSL endpoints? This way you can parallelize stress testing even on the PC level. Question is what you want to stresstest to need such capacity. A recent PC or Laptop can generate about half a Gbit/s worth of test-traffic against a HTTP server (and serve as much e.g. with Apache 1.3 under Linux). But I've still got to see a 100Mbit/s DSL line, not to mention a Gbit/s line... Bye Volker ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Which router to choose for port scanning Tobias Glemser (Jan 10)
- Re: Which router to choose for port scanning Volker Tanger (Jan 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Which router to choose for port scanning MILES John M (Jan 11)
- RE: Which router to choose for port scanning Curt Shaffer (Jan 11)