Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?
From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:56:19 -0800
MAPI? On 2/20/07, jezzzz . <jezonthenet () yahoo com> wrote:
I have some time on my hands (about two months) to work on a new network protocol fuzzer which I intend to write in Python. I don't have much experience in Python but my intention is to learn it by writing the fuzzer. I am looking for a protocol which is interesting and does not yet have a fuzzer for it. IMAP and RIP for instance already seem to have fuzzers. Anyone any ideas for other protocols? Thanks
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? jezzzz . (Feb 20)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? alan (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Kurt Buff (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? lobo (Feb 21)
- RE: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Paul Melson (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Chris Byrd (Feb 21)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? Tim (Feb 23)
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? jezzzz . (Feb 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? fiqbal (Feb 21)