Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans
From: "Burak CIFTER" <hybridus.ml () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:53:11 +0300
It may return false result due to ids/firewall rules. If there's no firewall, you won't need to do xmas scan. So I understand that the host is protected somehow. In this case (scanning with all techniques in the same time), the result wouldn't be reliable. You should perform the scan using techniques in an order from paranoid level of sensivity to connect scan. Burak Çifter On 8/10/07, Clone <en0lc () yahoo com> wrote:
Hello Everyone, I'm new to NMAP. I have a curious question that I wanted to get expert opinion on... I was wondering whether running SYN, FIN, XMAS, NULL and ACK scans in parallel on a target generate false results. Since same client IP is asking for opening & closing a connection on target machine will it not render some ports open and other closed in the report? RGDS ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- NMAP Concurrent Scans Clone (Aug 10)
- Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans Burak CIFTER (Aug 11)
- Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans Tim (Aug 11)
- Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans rajat swarup (Aug 11)