Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff
From: "Robin Wood" <dninja () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:48:33 +0100
I've finally tried to get all this working from source, I've got libnet 1.0.2a compiled ok but when I come to compile libnids 1.16 I get the following errors: for dir in src samples ; do (cd $dir ; make all) ; done make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/libnids-1.16/src' gcc -c -g -O2 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D__BSD_SOURCE -D__FAVOR_BSD -DHAVE_NET_ETHERNET_H -Wall -DHAVE_ICMPHDR=1 -DHAVE_TCP_STATES=1 -DHAVE_BSD_UDPHDR=1 -I. ip_options.c ip_options.c:31:2: error: #error "unknown byte ordering" ip_options.c:83:2: error: #error "unknown byte ordering" ip_options.c: In function 'ip_options_compile': ip_options.c:113: error: 'struct iphdr' has no member named 'ihl' ip_options.c:213: error: 'struct timestamp' has no member named 'flags' ip_options.c:271: error: 'struct timestamp' has no member named 'overflow' ip_options.c:277: error: 'struct timestamp' has no member named 'overflow' make[1]: *** [ip_options.o] Error 1 So I added -DLIBNET_LIL_ENDIAN to the makefile and tried again, got a bit further and got: gcc -c -g -O2 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D__BSD_SOURCE -D__FAVOR_BSD -DHAVE_NET_ETHERNET_H -Wall -DHAVE_ICMPHDR=1 -DHAVE_TCP_STATES=1 -DHAVE_BSD_UDPHDR=1 -DLIBNET_LIL_ENDIAN -I. killtcp.c killtcp.c: In function 'nids_killtcp': killtcp.c:17: error: 'IP_H' undeclared (first use in this function) killtcp.c:17: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once killtcp.c:17: error: for each function it appears in.) killtcp.c:17: error: 'TCP_H' undeclared (first use in this function) At this point I'm assuming that either I've missed something or something is wrong. Is there anyone out there who has got this compiled from source and, if so, can you give any tips? Thanks Robin PS The distro is Arch, gcc -v gives: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.3/configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,objc --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.3 in case that matters. On 5/9/06, Robin Wood <dninja () gmail com> wrote:
Hi all Thanks for the recommendations, I'm going to get it installed and play with it as everyone seems to be saying that it is worth it. I'm running ArchLinux distro and I'm fairly new to it so dsniff may be there somewhere but not in the basic repositories and I haven't got round to working out how to use others so I'll install from source and do a static build against the older libraries. Thanks Robin On 5/9/06, Ivan . <ivanhec () gmail com> wrote: > fair enouh, I like Ubuntu as my laptop is fully supported. > > Yes I recommend using it, it's not only dnsiff, but filesnarf, > mailsnarf, msgsnarf, urlsnarf, and webspy > > cheers > Ivan > > On 5/8/06, Robin Wood <dninja () gmail com> wrote: > > I'm running arch linux at the moment, found ubuntu got too bloated. > > Arch may have it somewhere but I'm yet to fully understand the package > > manager so could have missed it. > > > > Does this mean that you recommend using dsniff? > > > > Robin > > > > On 5/8/06, Ivan . <ivanhec () gmail com> wrote: > > > Robin, > > > > > > Try Ubuntu, it has it. Comment out the "universe" section in your > > > sources list, and then do > > > > > > ivan@vatra:~$ sudo apt-get install dsniff > > > > > > and yoru laughing > > > > > > cheers > > > Ivan > > > > > > On 5/8/06, Gary E. Miller <gem () rellim com> wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > Yo Robin! > > > > > > > > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Robin Wood wrote: > > > > > > > > > My distro doesn't have dsniff as a package so I've trid to compile it > > > > > and came across a few issues, in resolving them I realised that > > > > > dnsniff is quite old and relies on some unsuported packages. > > > > > > > > I have not run into another package that does what dsniff does as > > > > easily as dsniff does it. Long past time for a new maintainter to > > > > pick it up and run with it. Should not be too hard for someone > > > > that understands low level IP. > > > > > > > > RGDS > > > > GARY > > > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 > > > > gem () rellim com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > > > > iD8DBQFEXr5l8KZibdeR3qURAgzeAKCYk1fLPDBf/7p6yU5cC0JxNJK1RQCfVJKF > > > > i3s9A38X/2KXXi4PPm1/jJ8= > > > > =j2iv > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > This List Sponsored by: Cenzic > > > > > > > > Concerned about Web Application Security? > > > > Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's > > > > Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, > > > > you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the > > > > most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration > > > > testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a > > > > managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software > > > > (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can > > > > help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php > > > > And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your > > > > results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- to dsniff or not to dsniff Robin Wood (May 07)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Gary E. Miller (May 07)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Ivan . (May 07)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Robin Wood (May 08)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Ivan . (May 08)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Robin Wood (May 09)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Christine Kronberg (May 09)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Robin Wood (May 21)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Alok Vijayant (May 23)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Gene Cronk (May 23)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Ivan . (May 07)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff Gary E. Miller (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff revnic (May 08)
- Re: Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff bob (May 08)
- RE: to dsniff or not to dsniff Roman Lublinsky (May 11)
- RE: to dsniff or not to dsniff Gary E. Miller (May 12)
- Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff killy (May 31)