Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim
From: Cody Tubbs <tubbs () wispdirect com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:38:32 -0800
My figures come from estimation. I know someone making 75k doing QA for them, and they employee more QA engineers than you'd imagine. Smaller companies usually employee 2-10+ for smaller software packages (I've been a part of some). The reason I mentioned exploiting the exploiters is being that instead of hiring the exploiters (or should I say hiring the correct QA engineers to begin with), they'd rather suck up all of their exploits without hiring them, so that they can keep boasting they're unhackable after they make them sign off on not going pubic with the exploits (or their payment is void). I'm sure if you've been keeping up with vista, you would have read these "unhackable" claims already.
It's not hard to look up exploit archives and find the authors names in the exploit headers, do background checks on them, and call up the ones without insane criminal history. (and to prevent future rebuttal, if its their handle that only resides in the headers, it's not that hard to handle->name with a bit of IRC'ing/SMTP'ing).
If you go by ISS each vulnerability type varies in worth.To state the obvious, you are correct, $0.01- 50k is greater than $0, yet that's not what I'm trying to point out.
-Cody Tubbs Chris Poulter wrote:
50k per vulnerability opposed to hundreds (unlikely) 60-100k/year (unlikely) - the Q/A's might only get 40-50k/year, a security vulnerability technician would be the one getting paid the big bucks, but there wouldn't be "hundreds" of them? - how do you work that one out to be more feasible? Considering everyone is presuming there will be lots of exploits, 50k/exploit will equate to a much larger payout.... And exploit the exploiters? - how do you figure this one as well? Someone getting paid 50k/exploit is far more beneficial to the "exploiter" than getting nothing and just sharing the love....where MS would lose out more if this happened and leave them more exposed... I'm not arguing for either side of the case as I haven't looked into it enough to make my own judgment, but I don't think your assessment is accurate... -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Cody Tubbs Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:40 AM To: Radu Oprisan Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claimIt's cheaper to pay kids 50k for actually finding flaws, rather than paying hundreds of QA engineers 60-100k a pop to spend months finding nothing. Another reason M$ sucks, exploit the exploiters.-Cody Tubbs Radu Oprisan wrote:Ryan Meyer wrote:A number of popular tech news sources are reporting Trend Micro'sCTO,Raimund Genes, publicly claiming that there are "auctions" forzero-dayWindows Vista exploits. Further, he claims these auctions arefetchingapprox $50,000. Could anyone verify Trend Micro's claim?It seems dubious, at best, to me and possibly nothing more than pureFUD.Sorry to get off topic. Ryan MeyerThis could also be some covert way for microsoft to find their own vulnerabilities. That has happened before.
Current thread:
- Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Ryan Meyer (Dec 19)
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Sels, Roger (Dec 19)
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Radu Oprisan (Dec 19)
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Cody Tubbs (Dec 19)
- RE: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Chris Poulter (Dec 19)
- RE: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Sels, Roger (Dec 19)
- RE: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Chris Poulter (Dec 19)
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Cody Tubbs (Dec 19)
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim Cody Tubbs (Dec 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim krymson (Dec 19)