Re: JavaScript port scanning

["pdp (architect)" <pdp.gnucitizen () googlemail com>]

At the top of the web page I am mentioning that the scanning process
is not accurate... that's it, finito. you might get better results by
increasing the timeout value... give it something like 10000 or even
more. Still, it might not work! Take some time and go through the tiny
js file to see how it works.

BTW, you might have better luck with IE6.

cheers

On 8/2/06, TheGesus <thegesus () gmail com> wrote:
> I tried this out on my test network (firefox, no proxy) and it
> reported closed ports as being open, even silly ports like -1 and
> 77777.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> BTW, I could not find an M to RTFM.
>
> On 8/1/06, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen () googlemail com> wrote:
> > Inspired by SPI Dynamics - tiny JavaScript port scanner
> > http://www.gnucitizen.org/projects/javascript-port-scanner/
> >
> > --
> > pdp (architect)
> > http://www.gnucitizen.org
> >


--
pdp (architect)
http://www.gnucitizen.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security? 
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's 
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, 
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the 
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration 
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a 
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software 
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can 
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php 
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your 
results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------