Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest
From: Sol Invictus <sol () haveyoubeentested org>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:02:24 -0400
Ok.. now your adding words to what I was saying. We were talking about booking a VA or Pentest and what the difference was. If a Pentester is caught while testing it is acknowledged and he is usually given the opportunity to continue as though he had not been caught. (Because chances are someone will be able to get around detection given no time constraints.) And anyway, if a "Bangin Sharp Pentester" is on the job, he shouldn't get detected anyway, otherwise, he's not as sharp as he should be. ;-P You are naturally assuming that my ego is getting in the way here. I beg to differ. My ego has nothing to do with this. I've done a lot more reading/researching/and testing that many others have. On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 11:26 -0500, StyleWar wrote:
So - by your logic - if you bring a bangin sharp pen-tester in, and he's caught and his ingress methods are mitigated while still in the footprinting stage, that a pen-test did not actually occur... is that it? Or -- if physical security is 'pen-tested' and the tester is caught in the parking lot without credentials... no pen test existed or occurred eh? Quit trying to convince yourself of your own dogma and read for comprehension. Sol wrote:In the hands of a good pen tester, a pen test does NOT have to exploit vulnerabilities in order to achieve its value proposition.If there's no verification of the vulnerabilities using exploits then it'snot a Penetration test. What part of >penetration don't you understand? Anything less is a Vulnerability assessment. Period.-----Original Message----- From: StyleWar [mailto:stylewar () cox net] Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 7:01 PM To: sol () haveyoubeentested org; 'Mark Ausley, CISSP' Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest I can break it down like legos. The value proposition of a pen test is an understanding of whether the investment into detection and response is at an appropriate level. The value proposition of a vulnerability assessment is an understanding of whether internal controls such as patch management, physical security etc. are adequate given a specific risk tolerance.[snip]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest James Harless (Aug 04)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Mark Ausley, CISSP (Aug 04)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Sol Invictus (Aug 05)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest StyleWar (Aug 05)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Daniel Accioly Rosa (Aug 05)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest StyleWar (Aug 06)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Mark Ausley, CISSP (Aug 05)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest StyleWar (Aug 06)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Sol Invictus (Aug 06)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Arian J. Evans (Aug 21)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Sol Invictus (Aug 05)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Mark Ausley, CISSP (Aug 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Bob Radvanovsky (Aug 04)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Alice Bryson <abryson () bytefocus com> (Aug 05)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Arkem Paul (Aug 05)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Christine Kronberg (Aug 06)
- RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Richard Feist (Aug 07)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest xelerated (Aug 07)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Magdelin Tey (Aug 07)
- Re: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest Alice Bryson <abryson () bytefocus com> (Aug 05)