Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: Core Impact vs. Canvas vs. Metasploit


From: Peter Wood <peterw () firstbase co uk>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:42:29 +0100

We use Core Impact too. We pay $2500 a year plus $495 an engagement IIRC.

regards
Pete

At 08:51 28/04/2006 -0700, Damien Dinh wrote:
>I have Core Impact and it's gui is very easy to use; along with A-Z
>automation (scan, exploit, and load mini shell agent), you can also just
>drag any exploit onto a target and whamo!  It doesn't even break the
>service you're exploiting; at this point, you can drag and drop an
>agent; then you can automatically uninstall the agent as well.  Great
>tool but just very $$$$$$.
>
>Regards,
>Damien Dinh


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Wood FBCS CITP MIEEE MIMIS CISSP
Chief of Operations
First Base Technologies
Office: +44 (0)1273 454525
Mobile: +44 (0)7774 239915
www.fbtechies.co.uk
www.white-hats.co.uk


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request () cenzic com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: