Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: NAT is present?
From: "Paul Culmsee" <Paul.Culmsee () pivod com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:09:20 +0800
That is very likely a transparent proxy/cache showing that behavior. All HTTP/S traffic, irrespective of the destination is being redirected to a cache server. Try a HTTP echo command and see if you get output. It may reveal the make of the appliance or cache software. Regards Paul
-----Original Message----- From: pinoch0 () gmail com [mailto:pinoch0 () gmail com] Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2005 5:01 PM To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: NAT is present? I´m pen-testing a subnet, and when i scan the open ports i get something similar to this: *.*.*.1 PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http 264/tcp open bgmp 500/tcp open isakmp *.*.*.2 PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http https *.*.*.3 PORT STATE SERVICE 80/tcp open http https All the host of the subnet seems to have http and https open but when i try to connect to it a lot of then don´t back a response. I thing that the .1 (seems to be a router) have NAT and open http and https por all the hosts (up or down) . Can someone help me?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- NAT is present? pinoch0 (Sep 11)
- Re: NAT is present? Cedric Blancher (Sep 12)
- Re: NAT is present? Felikz (Sep 12)
- RE: NAT is present? xxradar (Sep 12)
- Re: NAT is present? Volker Tanger (Sep 14)
- RE: NAT is present? Philippe Bogaerts (Sep 15)
- Re: NAT is present? Volker Tanger (Sep 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NAT is present? Paul Culmsee (Sep 12)