Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Scanning Class A network
From: "Talisker" <lists () securitywizardry com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:40:35 +0100
Tarun I have been following this thread trapping any missing network enumerators these can be found here http://securitywizardry.com/enum.htm However, the size of network would suggest a distributed scanner especially given the constraint of a monthly renewal. I have these listed here, http://securitywizardry.com/enum.htm though the majority are better suited for vulnerability assessment rather than just enumeration and the list needs an update. I would suggest a hybrid approach where active enumeration is complemented with passive fingerprinting at the network boundaries. The problem with active scanning is that it is only true for the moment an IP address is scanned. However, passive fingerprinting will also detect any emerging hosts or hosts that aren't up for long. Furthermore, there is no bandwidth hit from their use. I have them all listed here http://securitywizardry.com/osfp.htm The website is vendor neutral and lists all products good and bad. It has been neglected just lately but with the help of some extremely capable folks is almost back to it's old self. As always, please let us know if we are missing any products. Cheers Andy Cuff Chief Technology Officer Computer Network Defence Ltd http://www.securitywizardry.com 07010 709014
-----Original Message----- From: tarunthenut () gmail com [mailto:tarunthenut () gmail com] Sent: 24 October 2005 13:33 To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Scanning Class A network Hello All, Recently I was given a task to carry out a port scan of an entire valid Class A range (Dont ask me what the huge pool of valid IP's was for :) ). The scan needed to be carried out externally, and not from within the network to identify hosts and ports exposed to the Internet. The problem compounded cause of the following limitations : 1. ICMP was not allowed in the network 2. The IP range was to be scanned every month for the entire port range fro= m 1-65535 for TCP & UDP After searching for a suitable scanner which could scan such a large range in reasonable time, I could think of only nmap, nessus, superscan and ISS. But because of the limitations stated above,all the tools took a huge amount of time (ran into month). I have struggled with options within the tools, tried configurable parameters (host time out, parallelism, RTT etc) and divided into smaller class C networks and scanned.but still the scan seems to take ages even if it is Any advise would be welcome :) Cheers tarunthenut -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Audit your website security with Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner: Hackers are concentrating their efforts on attacking applications on your website. Up to 75% of cyber attacks are launched on shopping carts, forms, login pages, dynamic content etc. Firewalls, SSL and locked-down servers are futile against web application hacking. Check your website for vulnerabilities to SQL injection, Cross site scripting and other web attacks before hackers do! Download Trial at: http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/pen-test_050831 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Scanning Class A network, (continued)
- Re: Scanning Class A network robert (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Mike Jones (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Justin (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Chris Byrd (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Matt Bellizzi (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Kyle Starkey (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Satanic.Brain (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network R. DuFresne (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Steve Micallef (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Volker Tanger (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Talisker (Oct 25)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Adam Jones (Oct 26)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Brian Loe (Oct 26)
- Re: Scanning Class A network barcajax (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Jarmon, Don R (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Mike Thompson (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Josh Perrymon (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Derick Anderson (Oct 24)
- Re: Scanning Class A network Cesar Osorio (Oct 24)
- RE: Scanning Class A network Michael Gargiullo (Oct 25)
- Re: Scanning Class A network tarun_the_nut (Oct 31)