Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: RF code scanners
From: Mister Coffee <live4java () stormcenter net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:37:35 -0700
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 05:19:09PM -0600, Richard Rager wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Mister Coffee wrote:That depends on what you're trying to do. Side note: http://www.radioreference.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=467 Openers are decidedly susceptible to jamming...All FCC class C devices are susceptible to jamming. Look at wireless alarm systems.
I wonder how many of these devices are designed to "Fail Open" when their receivers are overwhelmed. I don't imagine it would take much power to completely overload the front end of most garage door openers and the like. The "safe" way would be to "fail closed" of course, but we all know how security conscious most of the manufacturers out there are. Cheers, L4J
Current thread:
- RF code scanners Amit Deshmukh (Jun 16)
- Re: RF code scanners Mister Coffee (Jun 17)
- Re: RF code scanners Richard Rager (Jun 17)
- Re: RF code scanners Mister Coffee (Jun 22)
- Re: RF code scanners Richard Rager (Jun 17)
- Re: RF code scanners Richard Rager (Jun 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RF code scanners Maarten Van Horenbeeck (Jun 21)
- RE: RF code scanners Ng, Kenneth (US) (Jun 23)
- Re: RF code scanners Mister Coffee (Jun 24)
- RE: RF code scanners Ng, Kenneth (US) (Jun 23)
- Re: RF code scanners Mister Coffee (Jun 27)
- Re: RF code scanners Mister Coffee (Jun 17)