Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Piercing IPAD
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:58:54 -0600
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 22:09, Sanjay K. Patel wrote:
Product seems like a joke. Anyone claiming 100% security cannot be taken seriously. I see they use Bloomberg as testimonial client. I highly doubt Bloomberg relies on them for any security at all.
So in other words, you have no direct experience with the box other than reading the sales blurb. Oh well, thanks for your input. FWIW: It turned out that the firewall in question is a WatchGuard and not the IPAD. The IPAD is behind the WG and used for email. (The SMTP banner of a normal IPAD didn't match with our target. Also, the MAC address table of the compromised router gave it away ;) Hopefully I can spend some time with that box later on. I'm curious how that "True IP Address Expansion(tm)" works. Sounds like NAT to me. We'll see. Still, any real experience with that box is welcome. It doesn't seem to appear that often on the wild... Cheers, Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Piercing IPAD Frank Knobbe (Jan 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Piercing IPAD Frank Knobbe (Jan 30)