Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner)


From: Román Ramírez <rramirez () chasethesun es>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:31:14 +0200


Hello,

About Retina I must say that is one of the best audit tools I have
used... 

False positives are AND WILL BE in the market and in every security
tool, and Languard is not the best example about not-having false
positives (in my experiencie every network device I test has SNMP public
community as GFI shows :) )

I don't know if you are a final customer or a consultant, but one of the
auditor's tasks is to verify vulnerabilities and remove false positives
(and try to get more info about false negatives).


I know a lot about Netrecon, about the (deceased) cybercop, nessus and
newt, sara, saint, and for my experience I will take Retina and Nessus
without any doubt, efficience and productivity.

About your comments about the company, well, they are one of the best
security companies (for my experience @stake, eeye, bindview) and they
have a BIG customer support department, and of course, check if Nessus
has the same "customer support" (mailing lists that of course you can
find in eEye Web site too).

I have a deep experience with eEye in big projects and I know some
customers that are very happy with their tools (my own company in top of
the list).

Hope this helps

--
Roman Ramirez
Director General
Chase The Sun

+34 609 490 156
mailto:rramirez () chasethesun es
http://www.chasethesun.es 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: clarke-cummings () columbus rr com 
[mailto:clarke-cummings () columbus rr com] 
Enviado el: martes, 20 de abril de 2004 16:37
Para: pen-test () securityfocus com
Asunto: Why eEye Retina (was MBSA scanner)


Hello Everyone,

We recently began evaluating eEye's Retina product for our 
vulnerability assessment tool.  We have found the results to 
be very inconsistent, showing us vulnerable to issues that 
have been patched.  We've verified the patches manually, with 
MBSA, HFNETCHK, and LanGuard.  eEye didn't have a good answer 
as to why the results were so inconsistent.  Any guesses?

Also, how is their support response for those that are 
customers?  As a trial customer they aren't a very impressive 
organization.

Thanks in advance for the help.

Cheers,
Clarke

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .



--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and 
get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are 
guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one 
interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a 
course taught by an expert instructor with years of 
in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art 
hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better 
assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: 
http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical>
_hacking_training.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off
any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less
to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.
Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field
pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills
of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
Visit us at:
http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: