Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Wireless Pent-Test
From: "Raistlin" <raistlin () gioco net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:00:51 +0200
OK, I keep hearing about how simple it is to crack WEP using a variety of
tools. That is true.
I also keep hearing that some WLAN hardware manfacturers have modified their firmware to eliminate the generation of 'weak' WEP keys.
That is also true, altough you are confusing initialization vectors and kets, but these two vulnerabilities are NOT correlated. WEP (RC4, in fact) can be cracked, AND it also suffers from weak initialization vectors. Actually, removing the weak IV subspace, corrects the second problem but makes the first attack even easier. R. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tired of constantly searching the web for the latest exploits? Tired of using 300 different tools to do one job? Get CORE IMPACT and get some rest. www.coresecurity.com/promos/sf_ept2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Wireless Pent-Test Cesar Diaz (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Daniel Nylander (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test R. DuFresne (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Gregory Spath (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Seth Fogie (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Michael Sierchio (Oct 07)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Christopher Harrington (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Cedric Blancher (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Raistlin (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Leeds (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test Daniel Nylander (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test n0g0013 (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireless Pent-Test goat (Oct 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Artes, Francisco (Oct 06)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test Matthew Wagenknecht (Oct 06)
- RE: Wireless Pent-Test MJohnst5 (Oct 06)