Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: Defeating nmap fingerprinting on OpenBSD
From: Jonas Eriksson <je () sekure net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:10:32 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 per () same net wrote:
Hi I wonder if anyone successfully have configured OpenBSD to defeat the nmap os-fingerprinting option. I've tried using different option in pf, the OpenBSD packetfilter and by using IPlog. Never made any success.There are several instructions based on these techniques, but they don't seem to do the trick.
See, http://voodoo.somoslopeor.com/papers/nmap.html http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec2000/full_papers/smart/smart_html/index.html
Best regards, Per Nilla
Regards, Jonas Eriksson -- Favourite pickup line: Hey baby, wanna synchronize sequence numbers? Warning: not always effective -------------------------------------------------------------- Costs are climbing and complaints are rising as SPAM overloads your e-mail servers and Inboxes SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses and gives you the reports to prove it. http://www.securityfocus.com/SurfControl-pen-test2 Download a free trial and see just what's going in and out of your organization. --------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Defeating nmap fingerprinting on OpenBSD per (Apr 14)
- Re: Defeating nmap fingerprinting on OpenBSD Jonas Eriksson (Apr 14)