Penetration Testing mailing list archives
Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing?
From: Shoten <shoten () starpower net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:26:10 -0500
You could parallelize your scans, having multiple machines each handle a different part of the address range. Be careful though...if you parallelize your scan TOO much, you could cause a resource starvation issue (or something akin to it) in their firewall. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Molen" <rpmolen () MAIL IT-PROTECT COM> To: <PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 2:58 PM Subject: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing?
Am currently working with a customer to map their network prior to penetration/vulnerability testing using NMap. Customer doesn't allow Ping and wants 65000 ports tested. Since we can't Ping, NMap takes a long time to test a single host resulting in a very long testing period. We've
tried
setting a time-out value of 30 seconds but end up missing hosts with this value. Has anyone had an experience like this and if so, any recommendations to efficiently map a network without Ping? thanks
Current thread:
- [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? Randy Molen (Mar 15)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? Weiss, Bill (Mar 15)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? Shoten (Mar 15)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? morgothan (Mar 15)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? batz (Mar 15)
- Re: [PEN-TEST] Any way to speed up mapping for penetration testing? H D Moore (Mar 15)