Penetration Testing mailing list archives

Re: [PEN-TEST] Noisy ou stealthy ?


From: Iván Arce <core.lists.pentest () CORE-SDI COM>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:39:33 -0300

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas Gregoire" <nicolas.gregoire () 7THZONE COM>
Newsgroups: core.lists.pentest
To: <PEN-TEST () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:19 PM
Subject: [PEN-TEST] Noisy ou stealthy ?


Hi pen-testers,

just a question about methodology.

When you are doing some pen-tests, do you use the noisy way (full port
range scan, lot of scanning for cgi whitout IDS evasion techniques,
brute force attacks on FTP) or the sthealthy one ?

Both.
It all depends on time constraints, who did contract you to
do the pen test and what are the requirements of the customer.


I think that the noisy way is easiest (just schedule a Nessus scan , a
whisker scan and an ISS scan for the night, read the results and attack)

Well, generally we have to validate the results of our scans first.
I dont know if this is the case for everyone here but we usually
double check the results of nessus/iss/cybercop/nmap/etc.

I havent seen yet two runs of any of those programs
against a remote network across slow links that outputs exactly
the same results.

-ivan

---

"Understanding. A cerebral secretion that enables one having it to know
 a house from a horse by the roof on the house,
 It's nature and laws have been exhaustively expounded by Locke,
 who rode a house, and Kant, who lived in a horse." - Ambrose Bierce


==================[ CORE Seguridad de la Informacion S.A. ]=========
Iván Arce
Presidente
PGP Fingerprint: C7A8 ED85 8D7B 9ADC 6836  B25D 207B E78E 2AD1 F65A
email   : iarce () core-sdi com
http://www.core-sdi.com
Florida 141 2do cuerpo Piso 7
C1005AAG Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tel/Fax : +(54-11) 4331-5402
=====================================================================



--- For a personal reply use iarce () core-sdi com


Current thread: