PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Re: openvas vs nessus
From: Mike Patterson <mike () snowcrash ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:55:31 -0500
On 2010/12/14 6:17 AM, Ron Gula wrote:
For credentialed checks speed is also something you should consider. False positives are less of an issue with credential checks, but false negatives are a big issue. Lots of other scanners besides Nessus miss 3rd party apps like java, trend, iTunes, .etc. and only focus on patches related to the OS. Doing things like running netstat durign a port-scan dramatically changes the speed of the scan as well.
For what it's worth, the 3rd party stuff seems very well handled by Secunia. We have a CSI license, which wound up making me look pretty good - my prediction was "it'll be utterly dominated by Acrobat and Java." You can guess how it turned out. :-) Mike _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Current thread:
- openvas vs nessus Robin Wood (Dec 13)
- Re: openvas vs nessus Ron Gula (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: openvas vs nessus Robin Wood (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: openvas vs nessus Mike Patterson (Dec 14)
- Re: openvas vs nessus Ron Gula (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: openvas vs nessus Jody McCluggage (Dec 14)