PaulDotCom mailing list archives

Training Question - Securing Windows


From: Daniel at virturity.com (Daniel)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:18:55 -0000

505 is a quite good course with a lot of information in Windows in the
Enterprise. Your admin will have to have a pretty good knowledge on
Windows/AD/IIS/PKI already to fully benefit from the course. It's a bit over
a year now that i attended Jasons class so i'm not sure what the course
contains nowadays. Back then it was still pretty Windows 2003 based with
some newer content (like IIS 7) and the 'scripting day' was still VBScript,
not Powershell. If might be worth shooting Jason a question if your guy is
looking to secure Windows 2008 environment specifically.

 

Aside from SANS i didn't find any notably good Windows security training.
Maybe the Foundstone one. If you are a Microsoft enterprise customer it
might be worth asking your TAM if they have anything to offer on site.

 

From: pauldotcom-bounces at mail.pauldotcom.com
[mailto:pauldotcom-bounces at mail.pauldotcom.com] On Behalf Of Chris Merkel
Sent: 24 February 2010 22:21
To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List
Subject: [Pauldotcom] Training Question - Securing Windows

 

I have a Windows sysadmin who is interested in taking a class on defending
Windows systems. 

Anyone taken the SANS 505 Class - Securing Windows? Opinions?

He was looking at this class from Global Knowledge, but check out the course
outline - WTF does most of this have to do with defense? It looks like they
took the CEH and re-packaged it into something a sysadmin could get away
with taking:

http://www.globalknowledge.com/training/course.asp?pageid=9
<http://www.globalknowledge.com/training/course.asp?pageid=9&courseid=10836&;
catid=191&country=United+States>
&courseid=10836&catid=191&country=United+States

Aside from SANS - are there any other (good) options?

-- 
- Chris Merkel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20100226/d993d4e3/attachment.htm 



Current thread: