PaulDotCom mailing list archives

do you follow nist docs?


From: iamnowonmai at gmail.com (iamnowonmai)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:19:44 -0400

I pretty much follow the NIST Risk Management Framework, which references
all NIST docs. Off the top of my head I can't think of any exceptions. There
are minor tweaks, which you can do if they are documented. Call me crazy!

Full disclosure: I might switch to CoBIT some day! ;)

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Michael Dickey <lonervamp at gmail.com>wrote:

I don't want to usurp Tim's post, but with the mention of NIST, it brings
up a question I've always had.

Does anyone truly adhere to and build systems based off NIST docs? I'm not
talking "inspired by" builds that take a handful of the settings and use
them, but actually building to the specs such that you can say your build
guide is NIST? This is a bit of a sanity check for me, as I'm skeptical.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not dissing NIST! They make for great reading!
(Usually.)

_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20091030/874da76e/attachment.htm 


Current thread: