PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Specialise to survive?
From: denied39 at gmail.com (Michael Boyd)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:40:50 -0400
Here's a pretty good post on the subject: http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2009/08/myth-of-expert-generalist.html On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 16:55, Michael Douglas<mick at pauldotcom.com> wrote:
It all depends on what sort of a career you want to have. ?If you want to find a job pretty easily and have a great variety in what your day-to-day gig looks like, I think being a generalist is a valid option. ?However, if you have the inclination and want to focus on just one aspect of InfoSec you can do that too. ?Be sure to checkout what your local market will pay for each. ?Sometimes specializing can be very lucrative, unless perhaps you're focusing on something too niche (forensic analysis of devorak keyboards for AS/400 systems emulating Apple IIc systems). Also remember, it's only money... you should view your time as far more important. ?If you don't believe in your job and really enjoy or find what you're doing interesting, you do need to start looking elsewhere. ?Do NOT become a cow-orker. We (geeks) make very poor sheeple. <rant> If you really want to get me frothy in the mouth start saying stuff like ?"jack of all trades, master of none". ?Why? It's a LIE. Assuming no cognitive impermanent or organic brain damage, one can become really good at any number of computer based skills. ?I honestly believe the idea that someone HAS to focus on just one thing is a misguided "truth" perpetuated by those who are lacking skills themselves. ?(also bear in mind two things -- first I'm not professing to be a general know-it-all for computer stuff. ?Second, I've had too much caffeine. Again. ?So this answer should be read as 30% less ranty) </rant> Maybe we should have an InfoSec career round-table on the show sometime soon. ?Any votes on this? ?If you like the idea, please send some questions our way! - Mick On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Robert Portvliet<robert.portvliet at gmail.com> wrote:What do you guys think of this article? http://darkreading.com/blog/archives/2009/08/specialization.html Do you feel it's better to study different areas of infosec (incident handling AND penetration testing, for instance) or do you think it's best to pick one area & focus all your efforts on learning everything you can about it? _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom at mail.pauldotcom.com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Current thread:
- Specialise to survive? Robert Portvliet (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Michael Douglas (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Daniel (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Michael Miller (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Michael Boyd (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? John Navarro (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Adrian Crenshaw (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Jody & Jennifer McCluggage (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Robert Portvliet (Aug 14)
- Specialise to survive? Tim Krabec (Aug 15)
- Specialise to survive? John Navarro (Aug 15)
- Specialise to survive? Michael Douglas (Aug 15)
- Specialise to survive? John Navarro (Aug 15)
- Specialise to survive? Raffi Jamgotchian (Aug 15)
- Specialise to survive? Shane Kelly (Aug 16)
- Specialise to survive? Michael Douglas (Aug 14)