PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Warfare all over
From: arch3angel at gmail.com (Arch Angel)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:14:25 -0500
I am on the fence with this one, I don't agree with the phrase "warfare" as a general term for what any of us do. However, like Mike mentioned most of us have served in the armed forces at some point and I can visualize why a person may pull from their background for a term or phrase that would better engulf what they do. While at the same time people in techie positions, in general, have had to defend and fight to prove what they do for a company is important. An example of this would be an IT Manager who is also the Sys/Net Admin working for a widget company that does not take credit card orders and has always been cash and carry. The IT Manager walks into the office of the owner and says "Hey Bob, we really need to protect the network from people on the outside trying to break in and loosing all of our information." Bob then replies "Well that's not a big deal we are out of the city and nobody wants our widget crap, we just can't justify all the stuff you want. By the way, that request for a second person you asked for to help you, there is no real need for more people to fix our broken desktops your doing a great job and everything is fine." This is a text book example of an uneducated business owner and an IT Manager who has good intentions, he/she wants to protect the business and the employees but fails to convey the message clearly so that the owner, who by the way, may have a total of 20 people or so and only knows that computers cause all sorts of problems. One who feels a pen and paper inside a file cabinet is the only safe way. The IT Manager tries to think of a way to express the importance to the owner as well as educate them so they are better prepared for any additional requests. Now this is an example of a small business but in corporation the mindset is often the same, as the upper management are people who have crawled up through the ranks when computers and networking were not so wide spread. Looking back through history the one thing that always caught headlines in papers and magazines has been war and all the vocabulary surrounding war. This same tactic of grabbing the readers attention has migrated not only to IT but into a great many other fields. IT, for a great deal of it's life so far has always been looked upon as an expense not an asset. it has just recently, within the last 5 - 10 years or so, became so mainstream to were people have had to understand it's importance to an organization and the people of that organization. Keep in mind the Internet was spawned from the need for a government to transfer information safely in a time of war. My career in the military allowed me to get a broad overview of a great many things, and for that I am grateful, but most of all it has given me the greater understanding as to why the mainstream world has combined the military world with the IT world. While I don't feel they are equal when comparing a person behind a keyboard pecking away at some Linux box trying to stop or prevent an on going DDoS to that of an infantry soldier humping through the desert shooting bullets back and forth with some person they can see the face of, but I do feel the over all concept of IT and war are very close in relationship. If you have ever served and had the opportunity to work within a Tactical Operations Center (TOC) you will see multiple groups trying to function independently while still working as a single unit overall. The idea that these people are many miles away from the infantry solder mentioned above but still planning not only an attack but a defense for the overall unit. This is not unlike that of IT. We are a smaller unit, working in close proximity to many other smaller units, such as Human Resources, Accounting, Procurement, Finance, and in some places even the cafeteria, to name just a few. Whether these smaller units are all done by the wife of the owner or headed up by multi-billion dollar companies it's still the same. IT has to find a way to make all these units work together and at the same time be secure, just like the people in the TOC. Take for example your area of responsibility is to make sure the network is up and operational so that accounting receive the records from procurement in order to make the end of month timeline for the accounting books. You as the IT subject matter expert notice one of your routers has began to take excessive traffic, what do we call this? This is am example of an "attack", you area of responsibility has just come under attack, just as the commander's infantry soldiers have come under attack while on patrol. Neither the commander of the solder nor the IT expert are in direct fire, however their area of responsibility is, either way it is an "attack" which is a military term. What does the IT expert do when this happens? The expert begins to gather "intelligence" on the "attacker" in order to begin "defensive" measures to stop the "attack" and to try and prevent further "attacks". Still neither party is on the front lines so to speak but make split second decisions to keep whatever their responsibility is safe. The phrase "warfare" was brought in because what you have is an "attacker" and a "defender" just as in a conventional war. It can not, and should not, ever be compare to those who have bullets being shoot at them. Those individuals could, and have lost lives because of their situations, while as far as I know there has never been an IT employee was killed by a DDoS attack. While I believe in this day and age the battles we fight in the IT field is a modern warfare, or at least a form of warfare, and the common use of military terms is cross platform, so to speak, I would not agree we are in the "trenches". We, the IT experts of the world, are the command and control element of the warfare of today, as well as being the command and control of the warfare of tomorrow. I also believe the use of the verbiage that is cross platform has benefited the IT community, I feel it has meaning and has its place. I think that without the connection between the IT job and the words used to describe ware we would still be in Bob's office trying to express the importance of protecting his companies widgets along with the importance of protecting any and all information. People relate to those words, and by using them they relate to the IT industry. I also feel that a person can gain from the knowledge of history, the history of war, the war inside the IT world. take into account the vectors and methods used over the years and build a mental image, find the flaws that allowed for these attacks to be successful, and prevent those flaws from happening again. This too is a take on military warfare, learn from history so as not to repeat the same fatal errors in the future... Ok... Sorry for the novel, I am considering a sequel, which I will title "Airborne Packets - The Art of Silent Insertion" :-) Robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pauldotcom.com/pipermail/pauldotcom/attachments/20081231/1c39629c/attachment.htm
Current thread:
- Warfare all over daniel.schatz at hush.com (Dec 17)
- Warfare all over Mike Patterson (Dec 30)