oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler
From: Greg KH <greg () kroah com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:54:35 +0200
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:18:42AM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
Marcus Meissner <meissner () suse de> (Mo 16 Okt 2023 10:08:50 CEST):Regardless of your viability of subscription status I think we also (sadly) have to consider current geopolitical issues here.No, we should not consider anything else than technical/security restrictions here.
No one is outside of the laws of the countries they reside in, sorry.
And adhere the spirit of Free and Open Source (as far as I understand it), that there is no instance that can judge about political, ethical, religious issues. Free means free. Open means open.
And laws mean laws. Remember, this is not an "open" issue, it is "participating in a closed list issue" here. good luck! greg k-h
Current thread:
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler, (continued)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Igor Seletskiy (Oct 16)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Solar Designer (Dec 23)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Igor Seletskiy (Dec 23)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Alexander E. Patrakov (Dec 24)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Solar Designer (Dec 25)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Steffen Nurpmeso (Dec 25)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Solar Designer (Dec 25)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Greg KH (Dec 28)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Demi Marie Obenour (Dec 28)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Greg KH (Oct 16)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler Steffen Nurpmeso (Oct 16)
- Re: linux-distros membership application of openEuler W. Wadepohl (Oct 17)