oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: CVE-2019-3813: spice: Off-by-one error in array access in spice/server/memslot.c


From: Peter Korsgaard <peter () korsgaard com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 23:25:06 +0100

"Scott" == Scott Gayou <sgayou () redhat com> writes:

Hello,
spice versions 0.5.2 through 0.14.1 are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read
due to an off-by-one error in memslot_get_virt. This may lead to a
denial-of-service, or, in the worst case, code-execution by unauthenticated
attackers.

The attached patch fixes the issue in spice and is planned to be included
in forthcoming release spice 0.14.2.

This issue was reported by Christophe Fergeau (Red Hat).

References:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665371

Thank you.

-- 
Scott Gayou / Red Had Product Security

From 6eff47e72cb2f23d168be58bab8bdd60df49afd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:18:39 +0100
Subject: [spice-server] memslot: Fix off-by-one error in group/slot boundary
 check

RedMemSlotInfo keeps an array of groups, and each group contains an
array of slots. Unfortunately, these checks are off by 1, they check
that the index is greater or equal to the number of elements in the
array, while these arrays are 0 based. The check should only check for
strictly greater than the number of elements.

For the group array, this is not a big issue, as these memslot groups
are created by spice-server users (eg QEMU), and the group ids used to
index that array are also generated by the spice-server user, so it
should not be possible for the guest to set them to arbitrary values.

The slot id is more problematic, as it's calculated from a QXLPHYSICAL
address, and such addresses are usually set by the guest QXL driver, so
the guest can set these to arbitrary values, including malicious values,
which are probably easy to build from the guest PCI configuration.

This patch fixes the arrays bound check, and adds a test case for this.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau () redhat com>
---
 server/memslot.c                |  4 ++--
 server/tests/test-qxl-parsing.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/memslot.c b/server/memslot.c
index b27324efb..fb3d5cfd5 100644
--- a/server/memslot.c
+++ b/server/memslot.c
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ void *memslot_get_virt(RedMemSlotInfo *info, QXLPHYSICAL addr, uint32_t add_size
 
     MemSlot *slot;
 
-    if (group_id > info->num_memslots_groups) {
+    if (group_id >= info->num_memslots_groups) {
         g_critical("group_id too big");

What version is this patch against? I don't see memslot.c using
g_critical() neither on the 0.14 branch (which doesn't have 0.14.1) or
master?

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/spice/spice/blob/master/server/memslot.c#L97

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard


Current thread: