oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files
From: Jan Pokorný <jpokorny () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:53:06 +0100
On 31/10/17 12:48 -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
For example cat (and cpo and tar) work as expected: [...] [kseifrie@localhost vi]$ cat foo > bar
Just noting that cat has nothing to do with how the file born by the means of output redirection gets created. It's the responsibility of the executing shell that supports such a concept in the first place. -- Jan (Poki)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files, (continued)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Jeffrey Walton (Nov 01)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Kurt Seifried (Nov 01)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Jakub Wilk (Nov 01)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Solar Designer (Nov 01)
- Re: Security risk of vim swap files Ian Zimmerman (Nov 06)
- Re: Security risk of vim swap files Solar Designer (Nov 06)
- Re: Security risk of vim swap files Jakub Wilk (Nov 06)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Jakub Wilk (Nov 01)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Leonid Isaev (Nov 01)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Jan Pokorný (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Michael Orlitzky (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Florent Rougon (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Kurt Seifried (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Jakub Wilk (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Scott Court (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Nick Bowler (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Security risk of vim swap files Christian Brabandt (Nov 03)