oss-sec mailing list archives

openjpeg: heap-based buffer overflow in opj_write_bytes_LE (cio.c) (INCOMPLETE FIX FOR CVE-2017-14152)


From: "Agostino Sarubbo" <ago () gentoo org>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:59:29 +0000

Description:
openjpeg is an open-source JPEG 2000 library.

The fix for CVE-2017-14152 seems that wasn’t enough.

The complete ASan output of the issue:

# opj_compress -r 20,10,1 -jpip -EPH -SOP -cinema2K 24 -n 1 -i $FILE -o null.j2k
TIFFReadDirectoryCheckOrder: Warning, Invalid TIFF directory; tags are not sorted in ascending order. 
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 6376 (0x18e8) encountered. 
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 27154 (0x6a12) encountered.
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 32512 (0x7f00) encountered.
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 15163 (0x3b3b) encountered.
TIFFFetchNormalTag: Warning, Sanity check on size of "Tag 6376" value failed; tag ignored.
TIFFFetchNormalTag: Warning, Incorrect count for "FillOrder"; tag ignored.    
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, TIFF directory is missing required "StripByteCounts" field, calculating from imagelength.   
================================================================= 
==62004==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6060000000b6 at pc 0x7fd4d46ef89a bp 0x7ffc068d7070 
sp 0x7ffc068d7068 
WRITE of size 1 at 0x6060000000b6 thread T0     
    #0 0x7fd4d46ef899 in opj_write_bytes_LE 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/cio.c:67:23
    #1 0x7fd4d4736bef in opj_j2k_write_sot 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:4225:5
    #2 0x7fd4d4736bef in opj_j2k_write_all_tile_parts 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:11575  
    #3 0x7fd4d4736bef in opj_j2k_post_write_tile 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:11287 
    #4 0x7fd4d473545d in opj_j2k_encode 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:11028:15 
    #5 0x7fd4d47802f8 in opj_encode 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/openjpeg.c:775:20  
    #6 0x50b942 in main /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/bin/jp2/opj_compress.c:1993:36 
    #7 0x7fd4d3117680 in __libc_start_main 
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r4/work/glibc-2.23/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:289
    #8 0x41bc18 in _start (/usr/bin/opj_compress+0x41bc18)  

0x6060000000b6 is located 0 bytes to the right of 54-byte region [0x606000000080,0x6060000000b6)
allocated by thread T0 here:  
    #0 0x4d15c8 in malloc 
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-4.0.1/work/compiler-rt-4.0.1.src/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc:66    
    #1 0x7fd4d482be29 in opj_malloc 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/opj_malloc.c:196:12
    #2 0x7fd4d4762760 in opj_j2k_update_rates 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:5157:22
    #3 0x7fd4d473937f in opj_j2k_exec 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:7954:33
    #4 0x7fd4d473937f in opj_j2k_start_compress 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/j2k.c:11103
    #5 0x7fd4d478019c in opj_start_compress 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/openjpeg.c:758:20
    #6 0x50b90f in main /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/bin/jp2/opj_compress.c:1970:20
    #7 0x7fd4d3117680 in __libc_start_main 
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r4/work/glibc-2.23/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:289

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow 
/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/openjpeg-9999/work/openjpeg-9999/src/lib/openjp2/cio.c:67:23 in 
opj_write_bytes_LE
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x0c0c7fff7fc0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff7fd0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff7fe0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff8000: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 fa fa fa fa fa
=>0x0c0c7fff8010: 00 00 00 00 00 00[06]fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff8020: 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff8030: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa
  0x0c0c7fff8040: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff8050: 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x0c0c7fff8060: fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:     00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==62004==ABORTING
CINEMA 2K profile activated
Other options specified could be overridden
[WARNING] JPEG 2000 Profile-3 and 4 (2k/4k dc profile) requires:
1 single quality layer-> Number of layers forced to 1 (rather than 3)
-> Rate of the last layer (1.0) will be used[INFO] tile number 1 / 1

Affected version:
2.2.0

Fixed version:
N/A

Commit fix:
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/commit/dcac91b8c72f743bda7dbfa9032356bc8110098a

Credit:
This bug was discovered by Agostino Sarubbo of Gentoo.

CVE:
CVE-2017-14164

Reproducer:
https://github.com/asarubbo/poc/blob/master/00321-openjpeg-heapoverflow-opj_write_bytes_LE

Timeline:
2017-08-16: bug discovered and reported to upstream
2017-08-16: upstream released a fix
2017-09-06: blog post about the issue
2017-09-06: CVE assigned

Note:
This bug was found with American Fuzzy Lop.
This bug was identified with bare metal servers donated by Packet. This work is also supported by the Core 
Infrastructure Initiative.

Permalink:
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/09/06/graphicsmagick-memory-allocation-failure-in-magickmalloc-memory-c-2/

--
Agostino Sarubbo
Gentoo Linux Developer


Current thread: