oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution
From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso () google com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 22:36:16 -0700
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:43 PM, redrain root <rootredrain () gmail com> wrote:
what a awkward?? I have discovered a part of my vulns about ghostscript last year and exploited in fulldisclosure early! and these vulns are part of mine I was going to discovered these in defcon or other conference...WTF... u guys are logo designer??? there are two demos last year Evince Arbitrary Code Execution https://youtu.be/wzcrHXngfcM Attack Imagick through Ghostscript https://youtu.be/tPGm_ANDyOw
I don't think so, that is CVE-2016-7976 and is entirely unrelated to the issue being discussed, other than superficial similarity of the exploit. That issue was reported by me, and we discussed the ImageMagick and evince attack vectors at the time, you can check the archives if you're interested. http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/29 This issue (CVE-2017-8291) is a type confusion vulnerability (well, technically two vulnerabilities), and was found in the wild. Tavis.
Current thread:
- CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution Marcus Meissner (Apr 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution security (Apr 27)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution Kurt H Maier (Apr 28)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution David Black (Apr 28)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution redrain root (Apr 28)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution Tavis Ormandy (Apr 28)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution redrain root (Apr 29)
- Re: CVE-2017-8291 ghostscript remote code execution Kurt H Maier (Apr 28)