oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions
From: Leo Famulari <leo () famulari name>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:05:20 -0400
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:27:47PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
I suspect the solution is for people who rely upon these scanning tools to do the leg work themselves on the packages they care about. (i.e., the packages that annoy them the most.)
I think those of us who find these tools useful should work to improve the CVE database by adding the "fixed-in-version" information as it becomes available.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
Current thread:
- Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Ludovic Courtès (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Simon McVittie (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Seth Arnold (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Leo Famulari (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Kurt Seifried (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Jerome Athias (Mar 16)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Jerome Athias (Mar 16)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Leo Famulari (Mar 15)
- Re: Dealing with CVEs that apply to unspecified package versions Jerome Athias (Mar 18)