oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support
From: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold () canonical com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:31:38 -0800
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:43:39PM -0500, cve-assign () mitre org wrote:
MITRE does not assign CVE IDs to track whether the universe of products has similar or dissimilar time scales in adapting to technology changes.
While I can appreciate that MITRE would be in an untenable position to arbitrate trends on six-month timescales, SSLv2's replacement was released nearly twenty years ago. Please reconsider this position. Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support, (continued)
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Kurt Seifried (Mar 01)
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support cve-assign (Mar 01)
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Kurt Seifried (Mar 01)
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support cve-assign (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Tim (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Bob Beck (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Kurt Seifried (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Bob Beck (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Kurt Seifried (Mar 01)
- Re: Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Steve Grubb (Mar 02)
- Re: CVE's for SSLv2 support Kurt Seifried (Mar 01)