oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow
From: Mark Felder <feld () feld me>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:07:23 -0500
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015, at 19:45, Fernando Muñoz wrote:
I'm sorry, should I just give up about trying to get a CVE here? I've just noticed this issue is also being tracked at Red Hat at the moment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228297 - F
FreeBSD has a vuxml entry for this vulnerability as well. http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/bd1ab7a5-0e01-11e5-9976-a0f3c100ae18.html
Current thread:
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Fernando Muñoz (Jul 10)
- Re: Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Mark Felder (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow cve-assign (Jul 13)
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Alessandro Ghedini (Jul 13)
- Re: Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Alessandro Ghedini (Jul 13)
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Fernando Muñoz (Jul 13)
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow Alessandro Ghedini (Jul 13)
- Re: CVE Request - tidy 0.99 / tidy5 heap-buffer-overflow cve-assign (Jul 14)