oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE REJECT noise
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:50:19 -0600
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Solar Designer <solar () openwall com> wrote:
All - Can we please agree that CVE REJECT postings such as those Kurt has been occasionally making in here for a while are not to be made anymore? To me, and I suspect to almost(?) all other oss-security subscribers, they are just noise. I mean things like this:
Stupid question but who is "We"? I mean it's your list and if you want me to definitely not post these, I can respect that no problem, OTOH if you're looking for community consensus I doubt that'll happen in any meaningful way (bike shedding is the most likely outcome). Mitre people: is it sufficient if I privately inform you of such CVE rejects so they can be put int he database? -- -- Kurt Seifried -- Red Hat -- Product Security -- Cloud PGP A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 Red Hat Product Security contact: secalert () redhat com
Current thread:
- CVE REJECT noise Solar Designer (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise Kurt Seifried (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise Solar Designer (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise Reed Loden (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise P J P (Aug 20)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise Solar Designer (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise David Walser (Aug 19)
- Re: CVE REJECT noise Kurt Seifried (Aug 19)