oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova)
From: Jeremy Stanley <jeremy () openstack org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:21:52 +0000
On 2015-03-24 03:36:10 -0400 (-0400), cve-assign () mitre org wrote: [...]
So, does the OpenStack VMT have a position on whether to choose this latter scenario? In other words, if live migration fails because of a disconnected physical network interface, is access control for volumes intentionally undefined afterward?
As a member of the OpenStack VMT, I have no opinion on this. We don't generally express an opinion on whether a bug report _can_ have an associated CVE, only on whether the bug is associated with an attack scenario we deem likely enough to warrant the effort expended in discussing and fixing it under embargo, backporting to supported stable branches, then creating and publishing a formal security advisory. Of the many reports we initially receive as potential vulnerabilities, only a fraction actually end in an advisory as opposed to being considered a security hardening opportunity. -- Jeremy Stanley
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) Garth Mollett (Mar 23)
- Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) cve-assign (Mar 24)
- Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) Garth Mollett (Mar 24)
- Re: Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) Jeremy Stanley (Mar 24)
- Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) cve-assign (Mar 25)
- Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) Jeremy Stanley (Mar 25)
- Re: CVE request for OpenStack Compute (nova) cve-assign (Mar 24)