oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Re: Offset2lib: bypassing full ASLR on 64bit Linux


From: Daniel Micay <danielmicay () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 20:30:55 -0500

On 05/12/14 08:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 12/05/2014 04:44 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:43:44 -0500
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg-QLrU/DhXBlmnlhUoGqYIEF6hYfS7NtTn () public gmane org> wrote:

i couldn't find a reference to this in the nautilus bugtracker, so i
just posted:

 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741183

I tried to dig into this a bit. I'm not really sure, but based on the
output I assume nautilus is relying on file or libmagic to assess the
file type.

And that's what fails:
$ file --mime-type pie
pie: application/x-sharedlib


It seems there is no really easy way to separate executables from
shared libraries and whether this should be considered a bug in
file/libmagic. The only thing I quickly found that would be possible is
searching if a SONAME is present. libmagic uses some "magic" file
format to parse files, I don't know if that's capable of such complex
parsing.


Why does gcc and/or ld write a non-zero entry point?  If they didn't,
that would be an easy way to check.

--Andy

There are some libraries like glibc's /usr/lib/libc.so.6 with valid
entry points, so file would still have trouble disambiguating that way.

I don't really think this is a problem for libmagic/file to solve, if
it's really a problem at all. Nautilus could just remove support for
executing traditional executables too... using CLI utilities that way
isn't going to work out and GUI ones have desktop files.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: