oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Healing the bash fork


From: Hanno Böck <hanno () hboeck de>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 13:08:09 +0200

Am Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
schrieb "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler () dwheeler com>:

Finally: *PLEASE* let me know if you have any good ideas on how to
find vulnerabilities like this ahead-of-time. My article "How to
Prevent the Next
Hearbleed" (http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html) lists a
number of ways that Heartbleed-like vulnerabilities could have been
detected ahead-of-time, in ways that are general enough to be
useful.  I'd like to do the same with Shellshock, so we can quickly
eliminate a whole class of problems.

The "class of problems" here is imho that we have a bunch of tools that
get rare attention from anyone, are run by few volunteers, but they're
an essential part in running the Internet.

Just think about busybox, curl, wget, coreutils, gettext, gzip, ... - a
vuln in any of these could have severe consequences.

Maybe the topic here should be: "How can we get the (whitehat) IT
seucrity community to have a deeper look at neglected but important
opensource projects."

-- 
Hanno Böck
http://hboeck.de/

mail/jabber: hanno () hboeck de
GPG: BBB51E42

Attachment: signature.asc
Description:


Current thread: