oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression
From: Michael Samuel <mik () miknet net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:41:35 +1000
So just to clarify: On 9 July 2014 05:55, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk () phk freebsd dk> wrote:
param.show auto_restart 200 132 auto_restart Value is: on [bool] (default) Default is: on Restart child process automatically if it dies.
Does this mean that the parent holds the accept() socket open, so if a worker dies (eg. due to the client injecting a header into it's own connection) only that connection is affected? Regards, Michael
Current thread:
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression, (continued)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Kurt Seifried (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Marek Kroemeke (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Stefan Bühler (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Stefan Bühler (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Kurt Seifried (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Seth Arnold (Jul 03)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Sven Kieske (Jul 04)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Poul-Henning Kamp (Jul 05)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression cve-assign (Jul 08)
- Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Poul-Henning Kamp (Jul 08)
- Re: Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Michael Samuel (Jul 08)
- Re: Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Poul-Henning Kamp (Jul 08)
- Re: Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Michael Samuel (Jul 08)
- Re: Re: Varnish - no CVE == bug regression Poul-Henning Kamp (Jul 09)