oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO
From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac () debian org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:36:46 +0200
On ven., 2014-06-27 at 14:46 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/26/2014 02:21 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:- syslinux [5] seems to embeds lzo but I'm unsure if the vulnerable code is really present, I can't find lzo1x_decompress_safe() codeFor the record, I just upgraded Syslinux to LZO 2.07. The only code that ends up in the Syslinux build at all changed only in comments and in #if'd out code.
Thanks for the investigation. Is there a reason not to link with lzo instead of embedding it?
The only use of LZO is in the Syslinux core, which uses the assembly LZO implementation, which seems to have been unaffected.
Good point, my searches indeed usually don't include any non-C implementation, which might or might not be affected.
Syslinux does not use LZO on arbitrary data.
Thanks, so that's three reasons syslinux itself is not affected: - embedded LZO didn't contain the affected code; - syslinux core LZO assembly implementation is not touched; - LZO is done only on controlled data (not under anyone control?) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Don A. Bailey (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Solar Designer (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Don A. Bailey (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Solar Designer (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Don A. Bailey (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Don A. Bailey (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Yves-Alexis Perez (Jun 26)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO H. Peter Anvin (Jun 27)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Yves-Alexis Perez (Jun 28)
- Re: LMS-2014-06-16-1: Oberhumer LZO Solar Designer (Jun 26)